Earlier this week on Sunday, "Night of Champions" aired and it was one pay-per-view that attempted to live up to its theme. As the name would suggest, it's the show where all of the current champions have to defend their championships in one way or another. As strong as this concept is, though, I couldn't help but feel as though WWE slipped up more than a couple of times. How could have an Internet marketing company worked in order to make the show more effective in general?
One of the elements of the show that seemed to frustrate me more than anything else was how the interactive polls were done. WWE fans were allowed to vote on who they believed to be the greatest WWE Champion, Intercontinental Champion, amongst others. Each option would be given five candidates, which is the biggest issue that I have with this structure. I feel as though this is nothing short of a caveat, giving fans the illusion of a choice when they don't really have it at all.
There are many different networking platforms to take into account, so why doesn't WWE utilize those instead? It seems like Twitter could have been the perfect option, in my mind. It doesn't lock fans into a certain set of choices that they may not like, as they are then able to choose who they believe to be the best individuals for every poll. Why should they have to be short on options because WWE wants to keep matters as locked as possible at the expense of true selection?
I think that it would be for the best to allow an Internet marketing company to come into effect. The reason that I say this is that I think firms such as fishbat more than understand giving fans choices more than WWE seems to. It doesn't seem too difficult to give those who watch the product options and not just ones that WWE selects. I think that the company needs to have a more effective idea of what the best voting model is because this is not it.
Revisionist history is something that WWE has gone about more than a couple of times. However, I cannot help but feel as though this came into play at the expense of fan choices. I believe that those who vote on these polls shouldn't have to be stuck with just a couple of choices that they may not entirely agree with. To me, WWE could put forth one of the best platforms out there in Twitter but, for one reason or another, the company has stuck to more rigid polling options.
One of the elements of the show that seemed to frustrate me more than anything else was how the interactive polls were done. WWE fans were allowed to vote on who they believed to be the greatest WWE Champion, Intercontinental Champion, amongst others. Each option would be given five candidates, which is the biggest issue that I have with this structure. I feel as though this is nothing short of a caveat, giving fans the illusion of a choice when they don't really have it at all.
There are many different networking platforms to take into account, so why doesn't WWE utilize those instead? It seems like Twitter could have been the perfect option, in my mind. It doesn't lock fans into a certain set of choices that they may not like, as they are then able to choose who they believe to be the best individuals for every poll. Why should they have to be short on options because WWE wants to keep matters as locked as possible at the expense of true selection?
I think that it would be for the best to allow an Internet marketing company to come into effect. The reason that I say this is that I think firms such as fishbat more than understand giving fans choices more than WWE seems to. It doesn't seem too difficult to give those who watch the product options and not just ones that WWE selects. I think that the company needs to have a more effective idea of what the best voting model is because this is not it.
Revisionist history is something that WWE has gone about more than a couple of times. However, I cannot help but feel as though this came into play at the expense of fan choices. I believe that those who vote on these polls shouldn't have to be stuck with just a couple of choices that they may not entirely agree with. To me, WWE could put forth one of the best platforms out there in Twitter but, for one reason or another, the company has stuck to more rigid polling options.
About the Author:
Visit SEO Long Island company, fishbat, if you're looking for more information about Internet marketing with SEO.
Comments
Post a Comment